In all, 4.4 million Americans look to take advantage of the home
buyer tax credit before it expires by the middle of next year. From the
enactment in February of this year through October, NAR estimates 1.8
million households would have qualified to claim the first-time home
buyer tax credit. Now with the tax credit deadline extended till the
end of June 2010 (for closings, with contracts signed by the end of
April, 2010) and also available to many move-up buyers, an additional
2.6 million families would likely claim the home buyer tax credit.
The expected boost to existing home sales by more than 20 percent in
the first half of 2010 from comparable period one year before will
sufficiently trim away inventory such that home values will begin to
show increases by the middle of next year in many parts of the country.
The median existing home price could rise by 2 to 4 percent in 2010.
New home sales could jump by nearly 50 percent, though from very
depressed levels to figures that would be less than half the pace as
during the peak sales year in 2005.
One assumption underlying the home sales forecast is that the
mortgage rates will continue to remain at near historically low around
5 percent and not more than 5.5 percent. Meanwhile, the unemployment
rate is projected to stay high at slightly above 10 percent through the
first half of next year, before steadily inching down. Another
assumption is that the economy as measured by the GDP continues to
expand at nearly 3 percent, thereby laying the foundation for eventual
consistent net job gains sometime in the spring of next year.
There was indeed good news on the job front. In November, payroll
jobs were reduced by only 11,000. Of course, job cuts are bad, but the
momentum of fewer layoffs with each passing month is clearly positive
news. Consider this: job cuts averaged 688,000 per month in the first
quarter, 512,000 per month in the second quarter, 288,000 per month in
the third quarter, and 111,000 in October. In the construction sector,
the job loss in November was 27,000, but the pace of cuts has also been
diminishing.
The average hours worked by an employee rose in November as well,
implying more full-time hours over part-time. Moreover, employment
information from households and not from established companies suggests
a net job addition. A total of 227,000 jobs were added when based on
household survey, thereby nudging the unemployment rate lower to 10.0
percent in November from 10.2 percent in the prior month. Usually, many
start-up companies and consultancy jobs are not counted in the company
survey data, which explains for the differences between household and
company surveys on jobs. So as long as the job momentum moves for the
better, the housing market forecast of 20 percent higher sales and
stabilizing home values should hold up. An improving housing market and
the very important development of home values and housing wealth
stabilization will in turn better stimulate economic recovery.
Not all markets are equal, however. Detroit is hemorrhaging with 17
percent unemployment rate. The Washington D.C. area is buffered from so
much government spending with the jobless rate at only 6 percent. Even
if a bridge is built in Alaska, somehow jobs get created in D.C.
Something right is being done in North Dakota with labor shortages and
a state budget surplus. Bismark and Fargo have exceptionally low
unemployment rates of only 3 percent.
On interest rates, the borrowing rate for a home purchase and
refinance on a primary home has never been lower than it is now. The
average rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage was 4.8 percent in early
December. The rates will not move lower than this in 2010. All
indications in fact point toward higher rates next year. The Federal
Reserve could end the purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in
March as currently scheduled, though my guess is that MBS purchases
will continue for a bit further, though less aggressively. Even in the
absence of the Fed's MBS purchase, mortgage rates will not suddenly
rise to alarming levels. At most, mortgage rates will rise to the high
fives (5.6 to 5.8 percent). Given global financial market
inter-linkages, we need to be mindful that the Australian central bank
has already begun to raise its rates and Canada is looking to do the
same very soon. The European central bank, though not planning on
raising interest rates anytime soon, indicated it is looking to stop
its quantitative easing policy and possibly move in reverse very soon.
That means that, rather than the central bank buying government and
private market bonds out of newly printed money, it plans to mop up
excessive cash floating in the system to assure inflation does not
suddenly pop out of the bottle. With these developments, the U.S.
Federal Reserve will surely have to raise its fed funds rate sometime
in the second half of 2010 and stop the purchase of private bonds,
including MBSs. Otherwise, the dollar will lose its ground to other
currencies and steadily cut into our standard of living here at home.
The very high federal budget deficits could also do us in. After an
all-time high of $1.4 trillion in budget deficit in the fiscal year
2009, another trillion dollar deficit is on the card for 2010 and near
trillion in 2011 and 2012. A big factor in lessening the deficit is how
the economy grows. If the economy expands and leads to robust job
creation, then the deficit will be lower than projected. If the economy
hits many speed bumps along the way then the deficit will get quite
ugly. Therefore, a way to get out of the deficit jam is to promote
policies leading to economic growth. But unfortunately, the high
deficit could also put focus on ways to raise more tax revenue by
chipping away at mortgage interest deduction, property tax deduction,
and capital gains tax exclusion on primary residence. This discussion
could come alive in 2010 and if it does surface NAR will vigorously
defend homeownership policies that have been the very foundation of
stable middle-class based democracy, civic participation, and long-term
middle class wealth accumulation. Any housing policy leading to
unsuccessful homeownership (such as the ones associated with the recent
housing bust and foreclosures) should be dropped. But policies that
promote responsible and sustainable homeownership have incalculable
societal benefits and must be defended. In addition, given that
homeowners already pay nearly 90 percent of all federal income taxes,
trying to extract more out of homeowners will in the end be
counter-productive economically and politically.
http://www.realtor.org/research/economists_outlook/commentaries/forecast1209By Lawrence Yun, Chief Economist @ NAR